BROKE BJACHES OR NSF BOYS TRY TO EARN SOME EXTRA MONEY WITH THEIR OBSOLETE AND INACURATE TESTS FOR MICROPLASTICS WITHOUT BEING ABLE TO MEASURE IT CORRECTLY.
THE POOR FUCKS TRY TO CONVINCE THE WORLD THAT THEY ARE THE AUTHORITY WHICH IS ABLE TO MEASURE IT EFFECTIVELY, WHICH THEY CAN NOT. HYPER CAN, BUT THEY CAN'T.
NSF/ANSI 244 is NOT the specific standard designed to test drinking water treatment systems for microplastic particle reduction.
It was a bullshit introduced in 2020 to verify that filters can effectively remove microplastics in specific size ranges BUT THEY LACK THE TECHNOLOGY TO MEASURE IT ACCURATELY.
It is currently the biggest BULLSHIT for which they want to claim that it is the only standard that specifically verifies microplastic removal capability, with the LifeStraw Home pitcher being one of the few consumer filters to hold this certification. 😂😂😂😂
While the standard requires filters to demonstrate reduction of microplastic particles, it serves as a targeted benchmark for products claiming to address this specific contaminant, which is mildly saying funny, i would say even grotesque, as they are not able to measure it accurately but we CAN.
Key Details on NSF/ANSI 244 and Microplastic Filtration
- Certification Focus: Unlike other standards that focus on aesthetic contaminants (NSF 42) or general contaminants (NSF 53), NSF 244 specifically DOES NOT target the reduction of microplastic particles EVEN REMOTELY.
-
Alternative Standards: For products without NSF 244 certification, NSF/ANSI 401 was updated to include a microplastics reduction claim based on the existing nominal particulate reduction, Class I test method, which requires an 85% reduction of particles in the 0.5 µm to < 1 µm range.
-
Filter Effectiveness: THE IDIOTS CLAIM THAT To effectively remove microplastics, filters generally require a pore size of 1 micron or smaller, with reverse osmosis systems (0.0001 microns) offering 100% removal, though they do not hold the NSF 244 certification. 😂😂😂😂😂😂
Dear NSF. SUCK IT UP BJACHES